Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [PATCH] IDE Power Management, try 2 | From | Benjamin Herrenschmidt <> | Date | 05 Jun 2003 16:27:59 +0200 |
| |
> > I had to add yet another rq->flags bit for that, and I think that sucks > > You don't have if you use additional, default pm_state (on == 0). > This sucks too, but a bit less.
Can you elaborate ? I'm not sure I understand what you meant
> I think extending struct request is the way to go, > pm_step & pm_state or even pointer to rq_pm_struct.
Ok. I'll wait for Jens ack and go that way if he agrees.
Ben.
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |