Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sun, 29 Jun 2003 21:10:57 -0700 (PDT) | From | Andre Hedrick <> | Subject | RE: Dell vs. GPL |
| |
On Sun, 29 Jun 2003 ahorn@deorth.org wrote:
> > On Sun, 29 Jun 2003, David Schwartz wrote: > > >Date: Sun, 29 Jun 2003 14:45:35 -0700 > >From: David Schwartz <davids@webmaster.com> > >To: Andre Hedrick <andre@linux-ide.org>, Fluke <fluke@gibson.mw.luc.edu> > >Cc: linux-poweredge@dell.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > >Subject: RE: Dell vs. GPL > > > > > >> First since it effects ATA it is my issue for the most part. > >> You have no stake or issue to pursue GPL violations if there are any. > > > > False. He is an intended third party beneficiary of the GPL. > > > > As I understood it, only the copyright holder of the code could pursue GPL > violations. I believe the FSF will give help to anyone who wishes to > pursue such action for 'the little guys' out there.
BAWHAHAHAHA
Only if you assign copyright to FSF and they control you works, correction "their works" now.
Been there, got burned and no tshirt.
Andre Hedrick LAD Storage Consulting Group
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |