Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [PATCH][RFC] irq handling code consolidation (common part) | From | Miles Bader <> | Date | 27 Jun 2003 15:04:13 +0900 |
| |
Andrey Panin <pazke@donpac.ru> writes: > BTW sparc implementation of irq_itoa() uses static buffer for the formatted > string, is it really irq/preempt safe ?
Passinf in a result buffer seems simplest (maybe have the arch define a macro for the max-length).
[btw the name `irq_itoa' seems a bit odd; how about `irq_name' (or `irq_rep' for clu-lovers)?]
-miLes -- Somebody has to do something, and it's just incredibly pathetic that it has to be us. -- Jerry Garcia - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |