Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 24 Jun 2003 18:41:45 -0400 | From | Timothy Miller <> | Subject | Re: O(1) scheduler & interactivity improvements |
| |
Helge Hafting wrote: > On Mon, Jun 23, 2003 at 01:44:14PM +0100, John Bradford wrote: > >>Well, no, opaque window moving is fine if the CPU isn't at 100%. If >>it is, I'd rather see choppy window movements than have a server >>application starved of CPU. That's just my preference, though. >> > > That could be an interesting hack to a window manager - > don't start the move in opaque mode when the load is high.
This isn't really an issue if the graphics engine is doing the work and the X server doesn't busy-wait on the bitblt to finish (ie. does DMA or calls ioctl to sleep until command-fifo-has-free-space interrupt).
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |