lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2003]   [Jun]   [24]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [2.5 patch] ULL postfixes for tg3.c
From
Date
On Tue, 2003-06-24 at 22:12, David S. Miller wrote:
> I'll apply this, the INT64_MAX or whatever ideas are just
> stupid. We're saying what "bits" the device supports when
> it does DMA, so we should pass in a "bit" mask.

however it might be a good idea to define a PCI_DMAMASK_64BIT (and 32
bit) with the right values ?
[unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:36    [W:0.046 / U:0.224 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site