Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [2.5 patch] ULL postfixes for tg3.c | From | Arjan van de Ven <> | Date | 24 Jun 2003 22:32:19 +0200 |
| |
On Tue, 2003-06-24 at 22:12, David S. Miller wrote: > I'll apply this, the INT64_MAX or whatever ideas are just > stupid. We're saying what "bits" the device supports when > it does DMA, so we should pass in a "bit" mask.
however it might be a good idea to define a PCI_DMAMASK_64BIT (and 32 bit) with the right values ? [unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature] | |