Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [PATCH] Isapnp warning | From | Sean Neakums <> | Date | Sat, 21 Jun 2003 16:04:35 +0100 |
| |
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> writes:
> On 21 Jun 2003, Alan Cox wrote: >> On Sul, 2003-06-15 at 19:36, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: >> > Isapnp: Kill warning if CONFIG_PCI is not set >> > >> > --- linux-2.5.x/drivers/pnp/resource.c Tue May 27 19:03:04 2003 >> > +++ linux-m68k-2.5.x/drivers/pnp/resource.c Sun Jun 8 13:31:20 2003 >> > @@ -97,7 +97,9 @@ >> > >> > int pnp_add_irq_resource(struct pnp_dev *dev, int depnum, struct pnp_irq *data) >> > { >> > +#ifdef CONFIG_PCI >> > int i; >> > +#endif >> >> This is far uglier than te warning > > It depends on your goals. These warnings distract us from the real harmful > warnings. Will we ever have a kernel that compiles with -Werror?
Unless GCC never emits an invalid warning, no.
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |