Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 20 Jun 2003 15:11:32 +0100 | From | Matthew Wilcox <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] reimplement pci proc name |
| |
On Fri, Jun 20, 2003 at 04:02:28PM +0200, Martin Zwickel wrote: > Hi Matthew! > > Just one question: > If pci_name_bus copies the bus' hex to name and always returns 0, > the "if (!pci_name_bus(name, bus)) return -EEXIST;" would always be true, right? > > Or did I miss something?
That's currently correct. My understanding is that some architectures would like to decline to create overlapping bus numbers.
-- "It's not Hollywood. War is real, war is primarily not about defeat or victory, it is about death. I've seen thousands and thousands of dead bodies. Do you think I want to have an academic debate on this subject?" -- Robert Fisk - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |