Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 19 Jun 2003 13:28:40 -0400 | From | Joe Korty <> | Subject | Re: O(1) scheduler seems to lock up on sched_FIFO and sched_RR ta sks |
| |
On Thu, Jun 19, 2003 at 10:23:30AM -0700, Robert Love wrote: > On Thu, 2003-06-19 at 10:19, 'joe.korty@ccur.com' wrote: > > > I posted a fix for this a month ago that was ignored. Which is a > > good thing, since now that I look at it again, I don't care for the > > approach I took nor does it appear to be complete. > > Ah, sorry for missing it. Other than that tertiary statement inside an > if ;) my patch is about the same. > > Why do you think it is incomplete? It looks correct to me.
It may be better to add it to __activate_task() rather than after the single activate_task() use. At the time I wrote the patch I did not think to look at the five __activate_task() calls to see if they each needed the test. By me not looking, my patch is automatically incorrect, even if it turns out to be correct.
Joe
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |