Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 18 Jun 2003 06:02:10 +0200 | From | Andrea Arcangeli <> | Subject | Re: SCM domains [was Re: Linux 2.5.71] |
| |
Hi,
On Tue, Jun 17, 2003 at 08:38:16PM -0700, Larry McVoy wrote: > On Tue, Jun 17, 2003 at 06:55:47PM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > > Larry McVoy wrote: > > > > > > It seems to me that kernel.org is the right place but if hpa is too busy > > > (which I understand and respect) then we need to come up with some sort of > > > domain which is unused, simple, and memorable. I'm aware of the levels of > > > distrust people have for bitmover but we could pay for it and run the DNS > > > servers and let some set of community agreed on people manage the DNS entries > > > if that makes people feel safe. > > > > > > > I have no problem setting up CNAMEs in kernel.org if people are OK with > > it. Setting up actual servers is another matter. > > I think CNAMEs are all that we need now. BitMover and Penguin Computing > will host it for the time being and if we cross over to the dark side > someone else can step forward and host it and all you need to do is redo > the CNAMEs. > > We do need to advertise the "URLs" for the CVS tree and the SVN tree and > the BK trees as well I suppose. Is that a Gooch/FAQ thing? Richard, you > still out there?
this sounds fine to me. especially I can't think of an easier name to remeber than cvs.kernel.org/svn.kernel.org ;)
thanks for taking care of those bits too.
Andrea - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |