Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sat, 14 Jun 2003 11:30:51 +0200 | From | Svetoslav Slavtchev <> | Subject | Re: is Ruby dead ? lkml: Real multi-user linux |
| |
Quoting James Simmons <jsimmons@infradead.org>:
> > > I was wonderin what does this post by James Simmons means. > > > > James did you abondon ruby in order to bring something comersial ? > > there are no changes in ruby for a more then 4 monts, > > and ruby is hardly useable/ compilable, and you are talking about > > a production status? > > The 2.5.X version is broken. Instead I have beening working on making > the fbdev layer stable. The api I developed while working on ruby. The > 2.4.X version is quite stable. Alot of the framebuffer drivers could be > dropped onto the 2.4.X ruby kernel and it would work. We do have a few > changes in the framebuffer api that happened but that wouldn't take much > to port to ruby 2.4.X.
ruby 2.4.X ? does it exist? there is nothing about ruby-2.4 on the linuxconsole web site, mailing list. are there sources available anywhere? does framebuffer console work in ruby-2.4
> > did i misunderstood something, or you have droped ruby for something > comersial? > > No. I'm still working on ruby. All my 2.5.X is geared toward ruby.
where can one get your latest work? linuxconsole's cvs and bitkeeper have no changes since more then 4 months, there where no diffs posted to the mailing list too.
Svetljo
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |