lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2003]   [Jun]   [14]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: e1000 performance hack for ppc64 (Power4)
At 10:41 PM 13/06/2003 -0700, David S. Miller wrote:
> From: Lincoln Dale <ltd@cisco.com>
> Date: Sat, 14 Jun 2003 11:52:53 +1000
>
> unless i misunderstand the problem, you can certainly pad the TCP
> options with NOPs ...
>
>You may not mangle packet if it is not your's alone.
>
>And every TCP packet is shared with TCP retransmit
>queue and therefore would need to be copied before
>being mangled.

ok, so lets take this a step further.

can we have the TCP retransmit side take a performance hit if it needs to
realign buffers?

once again, for a "high performance app" requiring gigabit-type speeds, its
probably fair to say that this is mostly in the realm of applications on a
LAN rather than across a WAN or internet.
on a switched LAN, i'd expect TCP retransmissions to be far fewer ...


cheers,

lincoln.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:36    [W:0.041 / U:1.996 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site