Messages in this thread | ![/](/images/icornerl.gif) | | Date | Tue, 6 May 2003 06:35:38 -0400 (EDT) | From | Zwane Mwaikambo <> | Subject | Re: 2.5.69, aar_rx_intr, irq 30: nobody cared! |
| |
On Tue, 6 May 2003, Tommy Wu wrote:
> May 6 13:15:37 test kernel: handlers: > May 6 13:15:37 test kernel: [aac_rx_intr+0/212] > May 6 13:15:37 test kernel: irq 30: nobody cared! > May 6 13:15:37 test kernel: Call Trace: [handle_IRQ_event+147/232] [do_IRQ+194/304] > [ common_interrupt+24/32] [try_to_unmap_one+275/368] [bio_put+24/48] > [end_bio_bh_io_sync+33/48] [bio_endio+70/76] [__end_that_request_first+256/464] > [end_that_request_first+23/28] [scsi_end_request+36/160] [scsi_io_completion+561/1100] > [sd_rw_intr+470/480] [scsi_finish_command+208/216] [scsi_softirq+490/516] > [do_softirq+106/200] [do_IRQ+288/304] [default_idle+0/52] [rest_init+0/72] > [common_interrupt+24/32] [default_idle+0/52] [rest_init+0/72] [default_idle+41/52] > [cpu_idle+55/72] [rest_init+69/72] [start_kernel+379/384]
How spurious are these? I just looked at the OIMR programming and i can't see how this managed to slip by, perhaps someone really doesn't honour their interrupt disable bit.
-- function.linuxpower.ca - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| ![\](/images/icornerr.gif) |