Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 6 May 2003 15:18:24 -0700 | From | William Lee Irwin III <> | Subject | Re: Another question about thrashing |
| |
On Tue, May 06, 2003 at 10:20:00AM -0400, Timothy Miller wrote: > There didn't seem to be much interest in my earlier post about kernel > behavior when swap thrashing. > So my question is, are we not concerned about system behavior when one > process uses so much memory that it grinds everything else to a halt? > It appears that a thrashing process is being given more preferential > treatment than it should.
Design characteristic of global page replacement algorithms. It's not getting touched for 2.5/2.6
-- wli - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |