Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 30 May 2003 23:41:38 -0700 | From | William Lee Irwin III <> | Subject | Re: Algoritmic Complexity Attacks and 2.4.20 the dcache code |
| |
From: William Lee Irwin III <wli@holomorphy.com> Date: Fri, 30 May 2003 23:30:40 -0700 > If the strength reduction situation changes to being properly handled > by gcc for most/all 64-bit arches, include/linux/hash.h can lose a #ifdef.
On Fri, May 30, 2003 at 11:33:53PM -0700, David S. Miller wrote: > It's not a strength reduction issue, it's about not setting the > multiply cost properly in the machine description.
If it's literally that trivial I'll put digging around the machine descriptions on my TODO list.
-- wli - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |