Messages in this thread | | | Subject | RE: [BUGS] 2.5.69 syncppp | From | Alan Cox <> | Date | 26 May 2003 18:42:43 +0100 |
| |
On Sad, 2003-05-24 at 00:11, Paul Fulghum wrote: > I thought it was in place to serialize state changes. > I'll look at it harder, you may be right in that > it is not necessary.
The state serialization doesn't have to be 100% for PPP however, you already have the same races present due to wire time so I also think it should be ok.
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |