lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2003]   [May]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: time interpolation hooks
From
Date
On Fri, 2003-05-16 at 15:00, David Mosberger wrote:
> Andrew> (Those function pointers should go away in favour of
> Andrew> optionally-stubbed-out static calls. Minor point).
>
> Really? On ia64, we want to use cycle-based interpolation by default,
> but if firmware indicates that the cycle-counters may drift, we want
> to switch to one of several possible external counters (which counter
> gets used depends on hardware/drivers are is present).

I think Andrew is really suggesting to declare these two things
in an arch header, so if one needs it to be a function pointer one
can make it so.

--
David S. Miller <davem@redhat.com>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:35    [W:0.056 / U:0.204 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site