Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 15 May 2003 01:42:07 -0700 | From | Andrew Morton <> | Subject | Re: Race between vmtruncate and mapped areas? |
| |
Andrew Morton <akpm@digeo.com> wrote: > > So the mm/memory.c part would look something like:
er, right patch, wrong concept. That's the "check i_size after taking page_table_lock" patch.
It's actually not too bad. Yes, there's 64-bit arith involved, but it is only a shift.
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |