lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2003]   [May]   [14]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] 2.5.68 FUTEX support should be optional
Chuck Ebbert wrote:
> hpa wrote:
>
>
>>How about creating a master option like we have for experimental?
>>Something like "Allow removal of essential components?" (CONFIG_EMBEDDED)
>
>
> ...and that just enables another option: "REALLY allow removal of
> essential components?" (CONFIG_REALLY_EMBEDDED)
>
> :)

Reminds me of CONFIG_MORON back in December 2000

-dep_mbool ' NTFS write support (DANGEROUS)' CONFIG_NTFS_RW
$CONFIG_NTFS_FS $CONFIG_EXPERIMENTAL
+dep_mbool ' NTFS write support (DANGEROUS)' CONFIG_MORON
$CONFIG_NTFS_FS $CONFIG_EXPERIMENTAL
+dep_bool ' Are you sure? I hope you dont care about your NTFS
filesystems' CONFIG_NTFS_RW $CONFIG_MORON

;)


Carl-Daniel
--
And the mailer looked at the patch and, behold, it was good. And the
mailer decided to wrap the patch.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:35    [W:0.027 / U:0.540 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site