Messages in this thread | ![/](/images/icornerl.gif) | | Date | Wed, 14 May 2003 14:05:07 -0700 (PDT) | From | Davide Libenzi <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] 2.5.68 FUTEX support should be optional |
| |
On Wed, 14 May 2003, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> Followup to: <Pine.LNX.4.55.0305141342030.4539@bigblue.dev.mcafeelabs.com> > By author: Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org> > In newsgroup: linux.dev.kernel > > > > Not only. Like Ulrich was saying, the config documentation should heavily > > warn the wild config guy about the consequences of a 'NO' over there. > > > > How about creating a master option like we have for experimental? > Something like "Allow removal of essential components?" (CONFIG_EMBEDDED)
I'd agree. Not showing them at all for std configurations is even better.
- Davide
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| ![\](/images/icornerr.gif) |