lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2003]   [May]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: irq balancing: performance disaster
On Sun, 11 May 2003, William Lee Irwin III wrote:

> On Sun, May 11, 2003 at 08:17:53AM -0400, Zwane Mwaikambo wrote:
> > It was a bug in 2.4, fixed in Alan's tree by setting target_cpus to 0xff
> > (previously cpu_online_map). There is no noirqbalance option in 2.4
> > because there is no in kernel irq balancer.
>
> I vaguely like this notion because it removes a #ifdef and cleans up
> a tiny bit of its surroundings. But it's not quite a one-liner.

Nice, it's during init too so there really is no need for any sort of
optimisation, the inline can also go and make it __init.

Zwane

--
function.linuxpower.ca
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:35    [W:0.037 / U:0.392 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site