Messages in this thread | ![/](/images/icornerl.gif) | | Date | Sun, 11 May 2003 08:58:57 -0400 (EDT) | From | Zwane Mwaikambo <> | Subject | Re: irq balancing: performance disaster |
| |
On Sun, 11 May 2003, William Lee Irwin III wrote:
> On Sun, May 11, 2003 at 08:17:53AM -0400, Zwane Mwaikambo wrote: > > It was a bug in 2.4, fixed in Alan's tree by setting target_cpus to 0xff > > (previously cpu_online_map). There is no noirqbalance option in 2.4 > > because there is no in kernel irq balancer. > > I vaguely like this notion because it removes a #ifdef and cleans up > a tiny bit of its surroundings. But it's not quite a one-liner.
Nice, it's during init too so there really is no need for any sort of optimisation, the inline can also go and make it __init.
Zwane
-- function.linuxpower.ca - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| ![\](/images/icornerr.gif) |