Messages in this thread | ![/](/images/icornerl.gif) | | Date | Wed, 9 Apr 2003 22:00:47 +0200 (CEST) | From | Roman Zippel <> | Subject | Re: CONFIG_INPUT problems |
| |
Hi,
On Wed, 9 Apr 2003, Martin J. Bligh wrote:
> What to do ... > > I thought about inverting the logic, and creating CONFIG_HEADLESS > which is !CONFIG_INPUT basically ... but changing all the stuff > depending on CONFIG_INPUT is rather invasive. So I was thinking of > something like > > CONFIG_HEADLESS > bool "headless console support > default "n" > > if HEADLESS = y > define_bool CONFIG_INPUT = n > else > define_bool CONFIG_INPUT = y > endif
config INPUT default y if !HEADLESS
> or something vaguely along those lines ... except there doesn't > seem to be a way I can see to force a config option on from the > new config system? So that's actually a more general question, I guess ;-)
I know, this has been requested a few times, I hope to have something soon. (It's more a time problem.)
bye, Roman
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| ![\](/images/icornerr.gif) |