Messages in this thread | ![/](/images/icornerl.gif) | | Date | Tue, 08 Apr 2003 15:32:45 -0600 | From | "Justin T. Gibbs" <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] aic7* claims all checked EISA io ranges (was: [: Returned mail: see transcript for details]) |
| |
> On Maw, 2003-04-08 at 21:51, Robert Schiele wrote: >> Thanks for your note. Hope you didn't feel offended. At least this was not >> my intention. I just wanted to notify all people related to the affected >> driver. >> >> So it's up to the kernel tree maintainers to bring this fix into their trees. > > Maintainers submit changes to the Linux kernel tree, not vice versa. Its > push not pull
As far as the 2.4.X series is concerned, pushing has not helped. I've seen spelling fixes and incorrorct changes get accepted from non maintainers "instantly", while the maintainers changes are not accepted. Considering how long it took for the last set of driver changes to make it from -ac into kernel.org, I just assumed that this strategy was also failing. Is that really the only way to get updates into Marcelo's tree?
-- Justin
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| ![\](/images/icornerr.gif) |