Messages in this thread | | | From | Fredrik Tolf <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] new syscall: flink | Date | Tue, 8 Apr 2003 00:55:43 +0200 |
| |
On Tuesday 08 April 2003 00:25, Ulrich Drepper wrote: > The use of /proc is growing and you'll find that more than just > fexecve() will fail if you don't have /proc.
Well, that was no news, but still; you know like... shouldn't it be implemented? Or if I put it like this: If I were going to implemented, is there any kind of chance to get that public, not least considering that it is a new syscall and all?
Fredrik Tolf
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |