lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2003]   [Apr]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] new syscall: flink
Date
On Tuesday 08 April 2003 00:25, Ulrich Drepper wrote:
> The use of /proc is growing and you'll find that more than just
> fexecve() will fail if you don't have /proc.

Well, that was no news, but still; you know like... shouldn't it be
implemented? Or if I put it like this: If I were going to implemented, is
there any kind of chance to get that public, not least considering that it is
a new syscall and all?

Fredrik Tolf

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:34    [W:0.034 / U:0.388 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site