Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sun, 6 Apr 2003 15:10:01 -0700 | From | William Lee Irwin III <> | Subject | Re: 2.5.65-preempt booting on 32way NUMAQ |
| |
On Sun, 6 Apr 2003, William Lee Irwin III wrote: >> I presumed the audit was perpetual and/or ongoing.
On Sun, Apr 06, 2003 at 05:50:36PM -0400, Zwane Mwaikambo wrote: > Martin says the NUMAQ per node stuff isn't preempt safe, might be worth > looking there too.
The only scary bit is numa_node_id() in __alloc_pages(); this is fine because it's speculative anyway.
There isn't much usage of numa_node_id() in the i386 arch code.
-- wli - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |