lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2003]   [Apr]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: 2.5.65-preempt booting on 32way NUMAQ
On Sun, 6 Apr 2003, William Lee Irwin III wrote:
>> I presumed the audit was perpetual and/or ongoing.

On Sun, Apr 06, 2003 at 05:50:36PM -0400, Zwane Mwaikambo wrote:
> Martin says the NUMAQ per node stuff isn't preempt safe, might be worth
> looking there too.

The only scary bit is numa_node_id() in __alloc_pages(); this is fine
because it's speculative anyway.

There isn't much usage of numa_node_id() in the i386 arch code.


-- wli
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:34    [W:0.027 / U:0.540 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site