Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 07 Apr 2003 09:48:35 +1200 | From | Nigel Cunningham <> | Subject | Re: PATCH: swsusp - 2.5.66 incremental |
| |
On Mon, 2003-04-07 at 09:29, Pavel Machek wrote: > Hi! > > > > You really should have moved it to the driver model... having #ifdef > > > in suspend.c for every driver would be very ugly. > > > > Sorry. I thought that was the maintainer's job. > > Well, his job is to tell you to do it properly. Don't expect him to do > the rewriting himself. [Also he probably is not using swsusp so he > would not test that.] Pavel Ah. Okay. So I learn something else about the way kernel develepment works... the maintainer doesn't actually maintain the code! Guess I need to learn the driver model stuff.
Regards,
Nigel
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |