Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sat, 05 Apr 2003 05:53:54 +1000 | From | Nick Piggin <> | Subject | Re: WimMark I report for 2.5.66-mm3 |
| |
Hugh Dickins wrote:
>On Fri, 4 Apr 2003, Joel Becker wrote: > > >>WimMark I report for 2.5.66-mm3 >> >>Runs (deadline): 1736.51 1681.50 1010.98 >>Runs (antic): 579.62 496.75 517.06 >> >> WimMark I is a rough benchmark we have been running >>here at Oracle against various kernels. Each run tests an OLTP >>workload on the Oracle database with somewhat restrictive memory >>conditions. etc. etc. etc. >> > >No doubt the people who need to know do already know, but each time >you post this I wish that the long exegesis accompanying the numbers >would say whether a big number is better or worse than a small number. > A bigger number is better. AS does have something missing in recent mms due to a bad interaction with SCSI, but it is still around 20% below deadline for this test. It is being worked on.
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |