lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2003]   [Apr]   [4]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: WimMark I report for 2.5.66-mm3


Hugh Dickins wrote:

>On Fri, 4 Apr 2003, Joel Becker wrote:
>
>
>>WimMark I report for 2.5.66-mm3
>>
>>Runs (deadline): 1736.51 1681.50 1010.98
>>Runs (antic): 579.62 496.75 517.06
>>
>> WimMark I is a rough benchmark we have been running
>>here at Oracle against various kernels. Each run tests an OLTP
>>workload on the Oracle database with somewhat restrictive memory
>>conditions. etc. etc. etc.
>>
>
>No doubt the people who need to know do already know, but each time
>you post this I wish that the long exegesis accompanying the numbers
>would say whether a big number is better or worse than a small number.
>
A bigger number is better. AS does have something missing
in recent mms due to a bad interaction with SCSI, but it
is still around 20% below deadline for this test. It is
being worked on.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:34    [W:0.142 / U:0.112 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site