Messages in this thread | | | From | "Dean McEwan" <> | Date | Wed, 30 Apr 2003 10:44:12 +0000 | Subject | Re: Flame Linus to a crisp! AKA DRM |
| |
On Mon, 28 Apr 2003, Zack Gilburd wrote: > On Mon, 28 Apr 2003 03:35:10 -0700 (PDT) > Andre Hedrick <andre@linux-ide.org> wrote:
Oooh suprise.
> > > There is one fundamental problem, and nobody has addressed. > > > > Who will enforce the GPL over DRM violations?
The copyright author if they so choose to do so.
> > Since it is a blanket over the entire kernel, and you have formally > > (for the most part) have authorized DRM, thus one assumes you are the only > > one who can pursue in a court of law. > > Unless I am missing something, I was hoping for more of a sparse DRM \ > implementation; not a blanket. > I was hoping to be able to `modprobe drm` for when I needed to use DRM and likewise \ > `rmmod drm` for when I didn't want it. Maybe I am a little late in this \ > disucssion, but that's just my hopes and whishes.
-- ______________________________________________ http://www.linuxmail.org/ Now with e-mail forwarding for only US$5.95/yr
Powered by Outblaze - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |