Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 28 Apr 2003 22:18:19 -0400 (EDT) | From | "Richard B. Johnson" <> | Subject | Re: more for spelchkrs |
| |
On Mon, 28 Apr 2003, Steven Cole wrote:
> Randy Dunlap wrote: > > > >linux-2.5.68-current... > > > >init/main.c: mispelled :) > > > >net/*: apropriate; unparsable; sepciafied; > > I don't know what's wrong with "unparsable", but there are quite a few > other spelling glitches in net/*. The last line of
Methinks the only 'spell-check-able' word for this is:
non-interpretable
In many cases, the correct negative is 'non-' rather than 'un'.
Unfortunately, parsable, parseable, etc., are not (yet) words so they can't be negated with 'non-'.
Cheers, Dick Johnson Penguin : Linux version 2.4.20 on an i686 machine (797.90 BogoMips). Why is the government concerned about the lunatic fringe? Think about it.
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |