lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2003]   [Apr]   [26]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: missing #includes?
Salut,

On Fri, Apr 25, 2003 at 11:51:19PM -0700, Randy.Dunlap wrote:
> What's the preferred thing to do here? I would like to see explicit
> #includes when symbols are used. Is that what others expect also?

It's perlable. I might do this if you want.

> However, it makes for quite a large list of missing includes.

I suppose this is because it's implicitly included via some other
include file. You will need to descend through

#include <blah>

in order to do the right checks.

Thunder
[unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:35    [W:0.028 / U:0.164 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site