Messages in this thread | ![/](/images/icornerl.gif) | | Date | Thu, 24 Apr 2003 09:43:42 -0700 | From | Max Krasnyansky <> | Subject | Re: [BK ] new module infrastructure for net_proto_family |
| |
At 08:29 PM 4/23/2003, David S. Miller wrote: > From: Max Krasnyansky <maxk@qualcomm.com> > Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2003 18:41:56 -0700 > > At 04:30 PM 4/23/2003, David S. Miller wrote: > >Your stuff was unacceptable from the start because you didn't put > >the ->owner into the protocol ops. > But you didn't tell me that. You just said that it's "an ugly hack" without > giving any other feedback. > >As you mention, Rusty said this. > > What about this though > >I'm sure Arnaldo will deal with the sys_accept() issues. >But this is a minor issue, Arnaldo's stuff is architectually >solid.
:)
Ok Dave. I'm not sure why you're _completely_ ignoring my arguments. You should have just said from the beginning that you were going to ignore what I have to say regarding that issue. At least I wouldn't have wasted my time.
Sorry for bugging you. Max
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| ![\](/images/icornerr.gif) |