lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2003]   [Apr]   [24]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [BK ] new module infrastructure for net_proto_family
At 08:29 PM 4/23/2003, David S. Miller wrote:
> From: Max Krasnyansky <maxk@qualcomm.com>
> Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2003 18:41:56 -0700
>
> At 04:30 PM 4/23/2003, David S. Miller wrote:
> >Your stuff was unacceptable from the start because you didn't put
> >the ->owner into the protocol ops.
> But you didn't tell me that. You just said that it's "an ugly hack" without
> giving any other feedback.
>
>As you mention, Rusty said this.
>
> What about this though
>
>I'm sure Arnaldo will deal with the sys_accept() issues.
>But this is a minor issue, Arnaldo's stuff is architectually
>solid.

:)

Ok Dave. I'm not sure why you're _completely_ ignoring my arguments.
You should have just said from the beginning that you were going to
ignore what I have to say regarding that issue. At least I wouldn't
have wasted my time.

Sorry for bugging you.
Max

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:34    [W:0.026 / U:1.248 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site