Messages in this thread | | | From | Rusty Russell <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] Oopses in apply_alternatives | Date | Thu, 24 Apr 2003 13:12:10 +1000 |
| |
In message <20030423213038.GA6389@vana.vc.cvut.cz> you write: > Hi Rusty, > I somehow missed apply_alternatives inclusion into the kernel, so > I have no idea whether you are right person... > > It is not good idea to call apply_alternatives from module_finalize, > as apply_alternatives is __init function... It spectaculary crashed
Smells of Torvaldism. I missed it too: you're right, apply_alternatives should be marked
__init_or_module
instead.
Thanks! Rusty.
> @@ -802,7 +802,7 @@ > APs have less capabilities than the boot processor are not handled. > > In this case boot with "noreplacement". */ > -void __init apply_alternatives(void *start, void *end) > +void apply_alternatives(void *start, void *end) > { > struct alt_instr *a; > int diff, i, k;
-- Anyone who quotes me in their sig is an idiot. -- Rusty Russell. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |