Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [PATCH][ATM] obselete some atm_vcc members | Date | Sun, 09 Mar 2003 19:50:05 -0500 | From | chas williams <> |
| |
In message <20030309.133453.05058422.davem@redhat.com>,"David S. Miller" writes: >This stuff was all against a tree which still had the atm_dev >semaphore instead of the new spinlock. Therefore half of the patches >rejected and I had to put these parts in by hand.
the spinlock isnt new. the atm code has always had a global spinlock. i submitted a patch a couple weeks ago to convert the spinlock to a semaphore (so things would atleast work for now while i decide how to fix it the right way). so my confusion is 'new spinlock'. what new spinlock? did i miss something? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |