Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 7 Mar 2003 11:27:15 +0100 (CET) | From | Ingo Molnar <> | Subject | Re: [patch] "HT scheduler", sched-2.5.63-B3 |
| |
On 6 Mar 2003, Robert Love wrote:
> > in addition, timeslices should be shortest for high priority processes > > (depending on dynamic prio, not static) > > No, they should be longer. In some cases they should be nearly > infinitely long (which is sort of what we do with the reinsertion into > the active array for highly interactive tasks). [...]
yes, and in fact tasks with 'infinite timeslice' do exist: RT tasks with SCHED_FIFO/SCHED_RR.
Ingo
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |