Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 7 Mar 2003 09:15:18 +0100 (CET) | From | Ingo Molnar <> | Subject | Re: [patch] "HT scheduler", sched-2.5.63-B3 |
| |
On Fri, 7 Mar 2003, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> I can (could with your earlier patches anyway) eliminate the X stalls by > setting X junk to SCHED_FIFO. I don't have ram to plug in, but I'm as > certain as I can be without actually doing so that it's not ram > shortage.
okay. Can you eliminate the X stalls with setting X priority to -10 or so (or SCHED_FIFO - although SCHED_FIFO is much more dangerous). And how does interactivity under the same load look like with vanilla .64, as compared to .64+combo? First step is to ensure that the new changes did not actually hurt interactivity.
Ingo
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |