Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 7 Mar 2003 10:43:33 -0800 | From | Andrew Morton <> | Subject | Re: WimMark I for 2.5.64-mm1 |
| |
Joel Becker <Joel.Becker@oracle.com> wrote: > > > WimMark I report for 2.5.64-mm1 > > Runs with anticipatory scheduler: 547.28 580.69 > Runs with deadline scheduler: 1557.79 1360.52 >
Boggle.
I have a patch in my inbox which increases NickMark I throughput by 400%, so it should help this one.
Is the difference between 2.5.64 and 2.5.64-mm1 statistically significant? (It should be - the readahead changes).
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |