Messages in this thread | ![/](/images/icornerl.gif) | | Date | Fri, 7 Mar 2003 19:37:37 +0100 (CET) | From | Roman Zippel <> | Subject | Re: [BK PATCH] klibc for 2.5.64 - try 2 |
| |
Hi,
On Fri, 7 Mar 2003, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> > You are avoiding my question. If something goes into the kernel, the > > kernel license would be the obvious choice. Granting additional rights or > > using a dual license is a relatively small problem. But you must certainly > > have a reason to choose a completely different license? > > I gave my reason. You chose not to accept it, but that's not my problem.
Could you please repeat your reasoning? I must have missed something. So far I'm still trying to understand your choice and I haven't rejected or accepted anything yet. So far I also tried to be careful not to give any judgement, you're interpreting something into my words, I didn't intend to say.
bye, Roman
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| ![\](/images/icornerr.gif) |