Messages in this thread | ![/](/images/icornerl.gif) | | Date | Thu, 06 Mar 2003 14:14:07 -0800 | From | "Martin J. Bligh" <> | Subject | Re: [patch] "HT scheduler", sched-2.5.63-B3 |
| |
>> yes, an ELF flag might work, or my suggestion to allow applications to >> increase their priority (up until a certain degree). > > An ELF flag might be better, as it's declarative -- it allows the kernel > to implement 'interactivity' in various ways, so we can keep tweeking it. > Priority might prove to be a bit different than interactivity, so we > better not overload the two just yet.
Difficult to see how this would work. For instance, is bash interactive or a batch job?
M.
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| ![\](/images/icornerr.gif) |