Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 05 Mar 2003 23:11:54 -0800 | From | george anzinger <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] Making it easy to add system calls |
| |
Jeff Garzik wrote: > > Your patch makes it impossible to tell at an easy glance which syscall > is which number. The current code makes it quite obvious which numbers > are assigned to which syscalls, and which syscall numbers are available > for use. We lose valuable information with this patch, even if it does > wind up to be functionally equivalent.
Of course the numbers as well as comments on the inactive or unused entries could be added, just as they are today. I had also considered the possiblility of adding the system call proto type as a parameter in the macro. This could lead to a rather complete one entry description of the call.
Still, it seems to not be in favor, so I will let it drop.
-- George Anzinger george@mvista.com High-res-timers: http://sourceforge.net/projects/high-res-timers/ Preemption patch: http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/rml
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |