Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 05 Mar 2003 14:54:43 +0100 | From | Ron Arts <> | Subject | Re: PCI init issues |
| |
Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Tue, 4 Mar 2003, Ivan Kokshaysky wrote: > >>Indeed, looks like only pin 0 (INT_A of that card) is connected. :-( > > > Well, I'd say it looks like the MP table _claims_ that only pin0 is > connected. Remember: the claim was that this machine worked on WinXP. > > So there are at least two potential reasons for that: > > - The MP table is simply wrong, and WinXP gets the routing information > from somewhere else (ie most likely ACPI) > > - The MP table is right, and only pin0 is connected, and WinXP only uses > pin0 (ie it puts the card in some state where all irqs are shared > across all of the four tulip chips). > > Maybe somebody can come up with other schenarios. > > It would be interesting to hear what "Device Manager" (or whatever it is > called) unde WinXP claims the interrupts are on this machine... Are they > all on irq 48 on XP too? Or has XP gotten magic knowledge somewhere > (ACPI?) and they are on different irq's? > > Linus
I installed Win 2000 on this machine. It assigned every port its own interrupt, (IRQ 48-51), but it reported 'device is not functioning properly' on the first port (IRQ 48).
Ron Arts
-- Netland Internet Services bedrijfsmatige internetoplossingen
http://www.netland.nl Kruislaan 419 1098 VA Amsterdam info: 020-5628282 servicedesk: 020-5628280 fax: 020-5628281
Sorry Rabbit, Phasers are for kids... [unhandled content-type:application/x-pkcs7-signature] | |