Messages in this thread | ![/](/images/icornerl.gif) | | Subject | Re: Kernel bloat 2.4 vs. 2.5 | From | Daniel Egger <> | Date | 06 Mar 2003 04:25:15 +0100 |
| |
Am Mit, 2003-03-05 um 00.41 schrieb Andrew Morton:
> Please specify the compiler which was used, and use /usr/bin/size to report > image sizes.
The compiler was in both cases: gcc version 3.2.3 20030228 (Debian prerelease)
2.4.20:
2271565 Feb 25 17:08 vmlinux
text data bss dec hex filename 1730302 112564 176676 2019542 1ed0d6 vmlinux
2.5.63:
2561828 Mar 4 16:50 vmlinux
text data bss dec hex filename 1867787 167450 140292 2175529 213229 vmlinux
As I said, the 2.4 kernel has almost everything built in while 2.5 was stripped down to minimum size possible. The latter is still unusable since modules do not work. :/
-- Servus, Daniel [unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature] | ![\](/images/icornerr.gif) |