Messages in this thread | | | Subject | RE: [PATCH] cciss: add passthrough ioctl | Date | Mon, 3 Mar 2003 10:17:55 -0600 | From | "Cameron, Steve" <> |
| |
> On Mon, Mar 03, 2003 at 09:26:40AM +0600, Stephen Cameron wrote: > > Because, in order to flash the array controller firmware, > > it's got to be done that way... > > I don't buy this. Sorry. What's against creating a device for this > controller itself ? > (And yes, the kernel could use a formal ioctl number for "upgrade firmware")
Arg. Now I wish I didn't already port that code to 10 distributions. Please shoot me.
How do you want it done?
-- steve - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |