Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: 2.5.65-mm2 | From | "Steven P. Cole" <> | Date | 20 Mar 2003 14:15:22 -0700 |
| |
On Thu, 2003-03-20 at 14:07, Mike Galbraith wrote: > At 01:12 PM 3/20/2003 -0700, Steven P. Cole wrote: > >On Thu, 2003-03-20 at 12:48, Mike Galbraith wrote: > > > At 07:36 AM 3/20/2003 -0700, Steven Cole wrote: > > > Bottom line is that once cpu hogs are falsely determined to be sleepers, > > > positive feedback kills you. > > > > > > -Mike > > > > > > > >Sure, either post a patch against a known sync point, .65, .65-bk, or > >65-mm2, or send me the sched.c file itself (2600 lines might be a little > >too much for the entire list). > > > >If you send it in the next 2 hours, I can test today, otherwise I'll do > >it mañana. > > What the heck. It is attached. > > -Mike > > (and I repeat, don't _look_, just run it, and let me know;)
[steven@spc1 linux-2.5.65-mg]$ patch -p1 <../../xx.diff patching file include/linux/sched.h patching file kernel/fork.c patching file kernel/printk.c patching file kernel/sched.c patch: **** unexpected end of file in patch
It looks like the last hunk has no trailing context lines. Did your patch get clobbered?
Steven - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |