Messages in this thread | ![/](/images/icornerl.gif) | | From | David Lang <> | Date | Sat, 15 Mar 2003 19:28:22 -0800 (PST) | Subject | Re: [arch-users] Re: BitBucket: GPL-ed KitBeeper clone |
| |
hey guys, the suggestion to move to another list for this discussion was to reduce traffic on the kernel list, not add a bunch of arch discussions to the bitkeeper discussions.
pick one list and use it, don't use both.
David Lang
On Sun, 16 Mar 2003, Adam Spiers wrote:
> Date: Sun, 16 Mar 2003 02:06:17 +0000 > From: Adam Spiers <arch-users@adamspiers.org> > To: arch-users@lists.fifthvision.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > Subject: Re: [arch-users] Re: BitBucket: GPL-ed KitBeeper clone > > Tom Lord (lord@emf.net) wrote: > > `+'-named log message files _are_ going to change to something more > > vi-friendly. My bad. I'm both an emacs user and a > > unix-traditionalist. I didn't initially notice the problem and my > > reaction on hearing about it was "Well, vi is broken" -- but as a > > practical matter, arch does need to change in that area. > > Not that you need any more prodding on this direction, but it's worth > noting that both more(1) and less(1) suffer from this problem too. > > $ touch +foo > $ more +foo > usage: more [-dflpcsu] [+linenum | +/pattern] name1 name2 ... > $ less +foo > Missing filename ("less --help" for help) > - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ > - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| ![\](/images/icornerr.gif) |