Messages in this thread | ![/](/images/icornerl.gif) | | Date | Sat, 15 Mar 2003 15:08:24 -0800 | From | William Lee Irwin III <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] concurrent inode allocation for ext2 against 2.5.64 |
| |
On Sat, Mar 15, 2003 at 02:37:18PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: >> Looks like it's gone nuts when 128 processes all try to close lots of >> files at the same time. >> One possible reason for this leaping out is that all the instances are now >> achieving more uniform runtimes. You can tell that by comparing the dbench >> dots.
On Sat, Mar 15, 2003 at 02:58:42PM -0800, William Lee Irwin III wrote: > For some reason this version of dbench doesn't produce dots. I logged > what it did produce, though. It looks something like this:
There's a problem with the old dbench:
Throughput 82.0899 MB/sec (NB=102.612 MB/sec 820.899 MBit/sec) $ (time ./dbench/dbench 128) |& tee -a ~/dbench.output.15 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++128 clients started ******************************************************************************************************************************** Throughput 1841.38 MB/sec (NB=2301.72 MB/sec 18413.8 MBit/sec) ./dbench/dbench 128 73.31s user 6.75s system 1802% cpu 4.440 total
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| ![\](/images/icornerr.gif) |