Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 6 Feb 2003 17:45:20 +0000 | From | Christoph Hellwig <> | Subject | Re: [BK PATCH] LSM changes for 2.5.59 |
| |
[it would be really nice if you at least Cc'ed me when replying to my mails.. *sigh*]
On Thu, Feb 06, 2003 at 05:16:39PM +0000, David Wagner wrote: > Christoph Hellwig wrote: > >Well, selinux is still far from a mergeable shape and even needed additional > >patches to the LSM tree last time I checked. This think of submitting hooks > >for code that obviously isn't even intende to be merged in mainline is what > >I really dislike, and it's the root for many problems with LSM. > > You keep bringing up SELinux. Maybe you dislike SELinux; I don't know. > In any case, LSM is not there just to support SELinux. It's intended > to support a broad range of security modules and security policies. > LSM is bigger than just SELinux.
I bring up selinux because it's the only module in the lsm patches that I consider more than just a bunch of hacks. So, no it's not a dislike but they only thing I actually consider worth mentioning.
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |