Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 6 Feb 2003 22:05:42 +0100 | Subject | Re: [ACPI] Re: [PATCH] s4bios for 2.5.59 + apci-20030123 | From | Ducrot Bruno <> |
| |
On Fri, Feb 07, 2003 at 08:41:27AM +1300, Nigel Cunningham wrote: > On Thu, 2003-02-06 at 23:16, Ducrot Bruno wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 06, 2003 at 09:41:44AM +1300, Nigel Cunningham wrote: > > > Whether its slower depends on the hardware; on my 128MB Celeron 933 > > > laptop (17MB/s HDD), I can write an image of about 120MB, reboot and get > > > back up and running in around a minute and a half. That's about the same > > > as far as I remember, but has (as you say) the advantage of not still > > > having to get things swapped back in. > > > > The problem is the speed of the suspending process, not the whole suspend/resume > > sequence, especially in case of emergency suspending due to thermal condition, > > etc. > > Sorry. Perhaps I should have been clearer. I haven't spent a lot of time > doing timings, but there doesn't seem to be any significant difference. > In both versions, the amount of time varies with the amount of memory in
Ah ok. I understand now. S4bios is completely different from swsusp. It's just as if we were comparing APM suspend-to-disk and swsusp (and no, S4bios is *not* APM suspend-to-disk either).
-- Ducrot Bruno
-- Which is worse: ignorance or apathy? -- Don't know. Don't care. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |