Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 28 Feb 2003 10:58:41 -0500 | From | Jeff Garzik <> | Subject | Re: Proposal: Eliminate GFP_DMA |
| |
On Fri, Feb 28, 2003 at 09:44:14PM +0600, Dmitry A. Fedorov wrote: > On 28 Feb 2003, Alan Cox wrote: > > On Fri, 2003-02-28 at 14:12, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > > > i'm not the kind of person who just changes the header file and breaks all > > > the drivers. plan: > > > > > > - Add the GFP_ATOMIC_DMA & GFP_KERNEL_DMA definitions > > > - Change the drivers > > > - Delete the GFP_DMA definition > > > > Needless pain for people maintaining cross release drivers. Save it for > > 2.7 where we should finally do the honourable deed given x86-64 may well > > be mainstream, and simply remove GFP_DMA and expect people to use > > pci_* > > But why drivers of ISA bus devices with DMA should use pci_* functions? > > I'm personally wouldn't have too much pain with GFP_DMA because I have > compatibility headers and proposed change for them is tiny.
Do not let the name "pci_" distract, it works for ISA too :)
We can #define pci_xxx isa_xxx if you like :)
Jeff
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |