Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 28 Feb 2003 09:21:38 +1100 | From | Greg Daley <> | Subject | Re: anyone ever done multicast AF_UNIX sockets? |
| |
Hi Chris,
Please check out the uml_switch written by jeff dike for Mser Mode Linux.
It is a user-space program which emultates an ethernet switch (or hub). It emulates link-layer multicast on UNIX domain sockets.
Greg Daley
Chris Friesen wrote: > > It is fairly common to want to distribute information between a single > sender and multiple receivers on a single box. > > Multicast IP sockets are one possibility, but then you have additional > overhead in the IP stack. > > Unix sockets are more efficient and give notification if the listener is > not present, but the problem then becomes that you must do one syscall > for each listener. > > So, here's my main point--has anyone ever considered the concept of > multicast AF_UNIX sockets? > > The main features would be: > --ability to associate/disassociate a socket with a multicast address > --ability to associate/disassociate with all multicast addresses > (possibly through some kind of raw socket thing, or maybe a simple > wildcard multicast address) > --on process death all sockets owned by that process are disassociated > from any multicast addresses that they were associated with > --on sending a packet to a multicast address and there are no sockets > associated with it, return -1 with errno=ECONNREFUSED > > The association/disassociation could be done using the setsockopt() > calls the same as with udp sockets, everything else would be the same > from a userspace perspective. > > Any thoughts? How hard would this be to put in? > > Chris > >
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |