lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2003]   [Feb]   [26]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: Invalid compilation without -fno-strict-aliasing
On Wed, 26 Feb 2003, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
[SNIPPED...]

> > It was supposed to force x, which may be cached in a register,
> > to be written to memory __now__. It doesn't seem to do anything.
> > I think FORCE_TO_MEM() needs to claim that it uses most all the
> > registers. That will make sure that any register values get
> > written to their final memory locations.
>
> If so it wouldn't be inside the #APP/#NOAPP markers. You didn't answer
> my other question: was X in memory at the time?

It was in %ebx register and didn't go back to NNN(%esp) where
it came from. Like I said, it did do anything.

>
> You should be using something like __asm__ __volatile__ (""::"m"(x))
> anyway.
>

Yep. Probably.


Cheers,
Dick Johnson
Penguin : Linux version 2.4.18 on an i686 machine (797.90 BogoMips).
Why is the government concerned about the lunatic fringe? Think about it.


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:33    [W:0.021 / U:0.492 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site