Messages in this thread | ![/](/images/icornerl.gif) | | Date | Thu, 20 Feb 2003 11:06:45 -0300 | From | Werner Almesberger <> | Subject | Re: [RFC] Is an alternative module interface needed/possible? |
| |
Adam J. Richter wrote: > Anyhow, my point is that removing a piece of hardware > does not require that the corresponding module be unloaded > immediately.
Nor does the use of a module require the presence of any non-generic hardware in the first place (e.g. net/sched/, netfilter, PPP, etc.) :-)
- Werner
-- _________________________________________________________________________ / Werner Almesberger, Buenos Aires, Argentina wa@almesberger.net / /_http://www.almesberger.net/____________________________________________/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| ![\](/images/icornerr.gif) |